Wasatch
New member
Thanks again, Sludge.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
SpoiledMan said:Since switching from QEW to ONR, I get a number of people asking what I did different to their cars.
Sludge, you may want to reconsider, because that dirt needs some place to go if it's not going to scratch. A low-nap MF doesn't provide any place for the dirt to migrate to.
Scottwax said:What I have noticed is customers putting off waxing longer because their cars are noticably slicker.
Mikeyc said:I have QEW as well and was using it all winter. I just received some Optimum No Rinse Wash and tomorrow I'm getting the new Detailer's Pride 4-in-1 Rinseless Wash. Hopefully, I'll have a chance to try out all three this week and post my thoughts. Autogeek claims that their new DP product provides more lubricity than either of the other two . . . but I'll see about that. I plan on using all three straight (i.e. without QD) to make it a fair fight.
White95Max said:haha, I only have about 2oz of it. It was just a sample, courtesy of Flatstick. :wavey
SpoiledMan said:...and do YOU sir want to part with it? PM please...
shortspark said:I love QEW but I have not tried the Optimum. I ordered the Detailer's Pride 4-in-1 Rinseless Wash from Autogeek also because of the versatility. I'm not concerned about QEW's lack of lubricity because I always think it is a good idea to throw a couple capefuls of a QD in the bucket - that takes care of it. But the DP 4/1 has easy to follow instructions not only as a wash but also as a QD and clay lubricant. I'll compare it to QEW and then try the Optimum. Chances are I will not tell a whole lot of difference among them if that is the case I will probably go by price alone.
flatstick said:Sorry it did not work out for you. :sadwavey: at least you got a chance to give it a shot before you bought it.