Test drive with a 335i auto transmission.

imported_Grouse

New member
So I went to bmw of Bellevue with a friend to test drive the 335i. We found an agreeable salesman who promptly retrieved a key. While waiting for him We closely looked over the interior and exterior.



Exterior, the front end looks very much like my a4 usp front end, except slightly thicker on the bottom. The front headlights look like they are crying. There is a plethora of chromish gunk on the upper corners of the headlight eyelids. All 335’s come with a sport package that includes 18� wheels. The standard 17 inch wheels from a 328 IMHO would look better on this car if they were 18�. That is a personal choice thing I think. Moving to the rear, the horrible arse end is gone. Well almost gone. The tail lights have been changed. Now they look like a copy of the civic, which is a copy of the b7 a4. LOL.



The interior:

It has been nearly a year since I last sat in let alone drove a BMW. This Dash is sparse, simple and plain. I think a good case can be made for a sporty car to have a sparse dash free of distractions. The steering while is nice, thick, leather wrapped and has two thumb and finger paddles for dsg style shifting. I found both the thumb and finger portions to be just out of comfortable shifting reach for my fingers. I had to adjust my hands from my preferred hand position; it was at this point I also noticed how small the steering wheel was compared to my a4 sline wheel. The shift lever was great, right at the length and height I would want it. The radio, hmm well I was busy listening to the salesman drone on. I would imagine it is the same as any other 3 series.

The seats, are comfortable and have great support. Almost intrusive support. Even at the widest the side bolsters were intrusive to me, and the other person I brought along for tag team support. The seat adjustments were not in any way intuitive. They had to be explained by the sales rep. I have owned a Lincoln,tahoe,a4, and all of them had the same basic controls. Why because they work. At our shoulders we had about 4 maybe 5 inches apart between the two of us. Both of us are around 5’8� tall. The car felt fairly claustrophobic compared to my Audi a4.

The rear seating area is very nice, 2 bucket seats with a deep foot well and storage bin area between them. As far as leg room it is nearly non existent. Our sales rep had to sit semi sideways to be comfortable in the rear seat. The two rear seats are fold down seats. Which Is a great thing as the �trunk space is 12% larger than a Toyota corolla.� Yes I am quoting the sales rep. to give you an idea of what 12% larger than a corolla looks like take 1/3rd the space off a b6 Audi a4 trunk both in height and width. Also in the trunk you notice something truly amazing. No spare. Yep bmw did it again. They gave you no place to put a spare, and no spare to begine with. You get run flat tires. Tires that allow you to drive 150 miles at 55mph with only a driver in the car. Are you scratching your head at that one? Yep me too. I often drive 5-600 miles at a stretch with my wife, 2 kids, dog and I in the audi. I asked what am I supposed to do if I am on a long trip at nite with the family when a tire goes out. He said bmw road side assistance. Um… he must not have ever driven through Montana or the barren stretch of i-10 from phoenix to la. More on the tires later.



Driving:



So this is the reason why you started reading this. Well here it is. It’s fast, not earth shakingly fast but fast. It has a few things going against it though. For 300 bhp and 300 torque you would expect more from it in a few areas. Perticularly since it is a bmw. For instance I had hoped it would be nearly as good as the current M3. I can honestly say, aside from all the personal taste issues I related above it does not come close to an M3. Why? Some simple reasons.

Throttle response,

Different gearing,

Squidgy runflat tires

Body roll that makes a capsizing ship crindge.



First throttle response. Every time I jammed on the gas, there it was that split second hesitation before it responded. Normally I would say hey TT car. Turbo lag, but that is noticeable also, not in a huge way but it comes in that moment right after the car responds to you. Compared to my 3.slow audi which is known for ghey throttle response times. This is far worse. It makes you wonder what a decent chip can do in this area. Seriously the Throttle response makes it feel ungainly as you drive. Why is it like this, because it would intercede on the current gen M3. If it has a great throttle response it would be one step closer to beating the current model m3 0-60 0-100 numbers.

Separate gearing. Why not mate this with the current gears for the M3, why not give it the capabilities of it’s big brother. Why? Well why buy a current gen m3 with less torque when you can buy a TT 300bph 335 with more torque and with the same gearing. This to I think leads to it not nearly being as good as it should. All of the gears felt extra long. I would have loved to seen a them a bit shorter. Are you starting to see a pattern here.

Squidgy run flats. This is asinine. I am not kidding, just plain flarking stupid. When you combine the vehicle’s epic body roll with the squidgy tires it feels like you are driving on 15 inch rims and 60 serries tires. I hit 2 of the most fun curved onramps of 520 and it felt like I was driving my old 82 lincoln continental with balls. Sure it was fast as I wanted it to be, but I was floating on the road, not riding it like a train on rails.

Body roll of the titanic. I was expecting a bit of roll, a bit of squidginess. I had read 1 review out of 20 that mentioned it. Let me tell you. It’s bad. It gets really bad when you throw the weight of the car around. I expected a much tighter feel to the drive, but this was loose, and aloof. Not at all what I was expecting. So why do I think they nerfed the suspension. Well M3 if the suspension had been half as good as the current m3, this car would be fantastic. I could over look all it’s other faults. Because you could drive it like it had 300hp and 300lbft of torque. As it stands now I can honestly say, I could drive my audi faster in a curvy, straight, track situation. I was really surprised. Sure a new set of tires, 800, new set of coil overs 1500, new set of sways 700, and it would be fantastic. Why should I spend 3 grand to fix a car to what it should have been.



Final driving gripe.

The side mirrors are very small. Horribly small. They cut off your peripheral vision something fierce. Forcing you to turn sideways into the cars blind spot.



Conclusion, The 335 while a fast car with 300bhp and 300ftlb of torque is not a car that can realisticly be expected to be driven like a 300 hp bmw. You would need to think of it more like the Pontiac gto. A fast car with limitations. Bmw says it will have a 4door version with the same 300hp engine here in 07, with no real date for a all wheel drive train version. Is it fast, yes, it’s also better looking than the other current 3 series. What does price do you pay for that speed. So-so interior, intrusive seats, poor throttle response, body roll like a 500lb woman doing jumping jacks, and tires you better hope do not go flat at 3 am while traveling through the syskious.
 
Interestingly this review does not have anything in common with any other review I've read. In particular, the mention of body roll - every review I have read, every testamonial, and 6 test drives on my part and I have not experienced any significant roll, nose dive, or steering strafe. The words I have read, and personally associate with this car are "tight, dialed in, agile". In fact I can't recall a single review of the e90/e92 in the past year that has derided it's suspension. I would be very, very, very surprised if your car kept up with a 335i on a road course. I'll personally ship you a case of beer if you can find me one mag review that puts the A4 even close to the 335i in the skidpad or slalom. It isn't going to happen. I've owned an A4; great car although a tad lethargic (and unreliable), not a lot of nose dive, definitely some understeer (fwd bias :/), and about as much body roll as my g35; which I found to be significantly worse than the 330i or 335i.



Throttle response is a little odd too, since most reviews mention a distinct lack of turbo lag, and almost unbeliavable passing gear speeds (c&d got a 50-70 and 70-100 time that equalled the M5).



Seriously though, some of your comparisions are a little whacky you have to admit. Comparing the trunk to a sedan? Same with the rear seats. It isn't as roomy as my G35 sedan either - but you know....it's a coupe. Actually, think of a current coupe on the market right now with a trunk as big as the 328/335. The G coupes is about 1/8th the size with no fold down seats. Same goes for the rear leg room - it's got more room in the back than the IS350 *sedan*. It's easy to say its claustrophobic when comparing it to a not-so-wee A4.



Oh and intrusive seats. Heh, in 10 years of using those same sport seats I've yet to hear a single disperaging remark about them. The interior is not up to par with an Audi, no - but the seats. Those seats are like heaven.



Oh, I'm wondering if the car you drove had paddle shifters? They've been the source of universal praise - incredibly fast, easy to use, etc... I'm thinking you didn't like them.



I do admit it is no M3, of course I don't understand the comparo's to the M3. The M3 is half way to being a purpose built car. It's stiff as hell, a relatively harsh ride, has LSD, runs in the high revs. The 335i is still a 3-series. Better to compare it to the S4. (which it will likely trounce).



Anyway ya, you don't like it - seems most people who drive em do. Enjoy your A4. :)
 
LOL Touchy subject. I had very high hopes for this car. It has been some what of a let down. This is my subjective review. take into account you are in canada. You may have a significantly different model than us US dopes. The one site that warned me about the suspension was the local bmw club, of which i am a member of. To quote myself from there.



I am bracing myself for the backlash of audi loyalty responses. I'll preface my review with this. While i love my audi it is not the best car in the world, it just happens to be the best car for me. It is the car that most fits me. That being said I have eagarly awaited the arrival of the 335i. I have followed it as close as an audi boy can. I had hoped it would meet my expectations, even exceed them. It did not. in many ways.



here is my review. Keep in mind I love my audi, and i scored the bmw against it. As i am sure many of you would score your bmw's against an audi if you were test driving the audi.



I truely think BMW has held back the 335i potential because of the current M3. Which is a shame. It IMHO should have, m3 gearing, better throttle response, standard tires, Sways, and better coilovers.



If just the sways and coilovers were changed it would be a great car, if all of that was changed it would be the car of the decade. Don't get me wrong picus, It's a good car, My contention is it is not what it should be.
 
I think like you mentioned the issue there is the current M3. It's already as fast as the current M3, if they made it handle the same, well, it'd be the M3. I definitely do not agree on the body roll, but hey I guess that's subjective. I will still buy you that case if you can find me a single objective review that scores *even the S4* ahead in the skidpad or slalom. I personally think this car is going to dominate road tracks in its price class. I've been lucky enough to put over 15k on a 2005.5 S4 this year, when it came time for me to buy it was that or the 335i, and I choose the 335i for a number of reasons. Have you modded your A4? I only ask because that would make a lot more sense - my G coupe in Cal was modded heavily (sways, coilovers, underpinnings, regulators, etc) and felt as good as a 335 stock, my G sedan is not modded and feels like a boat compared to the 335. My A4 was not modded and was not as tight as the 335 (imo). The S4 I am driving is modded, but only engine mods - it is not as tight as the 335 - it has slightly less dive, but it has more understeer by a long shot, and more roll (much heavier). Obvious advantages the S4 has is AWD and the interior (the interior is WAY nicer), cons are it's slower, heavier, less agile (imo), and $15k more expensive.



I do absolutely agree on RFTs - they are asinine. Many people replace them and carry a fix-a-flat kit. Personally I'd rather have more trunk space than space for a spare, but I can see the argument for a spare.



Oh, the Canadian and US models are identical.



Cheers.
 
Look I am not saying the audi is better, What i am saying is. This car is not what it should have been. It has been nerfed for the sake of not hurting the current M3 sales. I have the 3.0 usp which is tight, it does have roll but it is significantly different than both the 1.8t and the s4. Personally it drives better than both.







My audi, is an audi. Put coil overs on it, and stiffer sways and it will still be nose heavy. Throw a chip on it and my throttle response will be 100% better. It will go from a good car to a great car.



Chip the bmw 335i for throttle response, ditch the runflats, put decent sways, and coilovers and it will go from a good car to the car of this decade.



I understood there were some differences in canadian and american models. But that is internet hearsay. I know there is differences in US/Canadian A4.
 
Yeah as a BMW owner I do have a few gripes as of lately....



I did get to drive an E90 last week as a loaner car, it's no 335, but the interior is basically the same.



I don't like the new interior compared to the E46. The power window controls are out of reach, the steering wheel controls suck, Cup holders are a joke, the turn signals are difficult to operate, and the dual temperatuer climate controls are kind of pointless. The list goes on and on.



As for the 335i, with that kind of HP and price tag, I am kind of disappointed that the car comes standard with 225 series tires. You have to pay extra to get the 245 series tires that a car with that kind of HP and price should come standard with!



I think I will be keeping my E46 ZHP until this transition in models changes once again.....
 
I don't think there will be many orders without the sport package, so the 245's will be on most of the cars. People order that package for the seats of course (and folks who want the paddles have to order it).



My one gripe with this car, aside from the RFT's, is that it lacks LSD. I personally think the addition of LSD and aftermarket tires and it'll kill everything in its price class/segment. ECU reflashes will just be gravy.
 
Interesting article. :) They tested the 335i at Nurburgring against an M3 and a stinkin' C55 AMG (5.4L V8). The 335i was running on 17" bridgestone runflats. Interesting notes in bold:





Laptime Nordschleife 8.26 min (4 seconds slower than M3)

Laptime Hockenheim 1.17,8 min (0,8 seconds faster than C55 and 1.5 seconds slower than M3) (compare that to some other cars on Hockenheim, that 1.17.8 time is stupid fast)



0-100km/h 5.6 sec

0-200km/h 20,7 sec



36m slalom: 130km/h (M3 123km/h, C55 122km/h)

110m change lane: 136km/h (M6 137km/h, M3 136km/h, C55 134km/h)

Wet track: 1.36,8 min (M5 E60 1.36, 7min)



G-powers: 1.15g (C55, 1,10g and M3 1.10g)



Overall score: 45 points (1 point better than M3)



Scans available here: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=30140



(some hockenheim comparo numbers: http://www.crash.net/news_view~t~Qualifying-times---Hockenheim-~cid~13~id~127992.htm)
 
Hmm Steve@vnshu has dyno'd it here are the graphs.

stock

335idyno.jpg


Mild tune for top end power.

335idynotuningstep1.jpg




To say the least that is great, I think asking for more than 30-40 hp out of a 11:1 compression engine is asking for issues, but From what he says he's looking to carry the gains shown above to the lower end and mid range power.



On a side note, Many people are complaining about the squidgyness of the runflats, Maybe my issue with the suspension has more to do with the RF than it does the suspension.



If that is the case, tire swap and an LSD and i might be a very happy camper.
 
Very interesting discussion we have going here.





The one thing I have come to terms with is that Audi owners and BMW owners are very different, typically. I have friends on both sides and they seem to find that love with either vehicle and always look forward from it. Each have their pros/cons, but with these two companies in particular, their followers are very loyal.





Having the pleasure to detail both, I would have to say that the Audi fit, finish, and quality is absolutely unsurpassed. However, to drive, a BMW would take my money any day. Having not poked into the new 3 yet (but will), I can't say much, but I will say I was very underwhelmed after driving a B7 A4 2.0t S-line 6mt. The car was an absolute pig and it sounded like an old VW diesel. You looked good and felt good in the car, just don't drive it hard, it won't respond. Poor throttle response, weak handling, etc etc, I quickly left the dealer and put my money elsewhere.



On the other hand, I've worked on a couple 4-7 year old BMWs and have to say, they don't age like a fine wine. Maybe it was the select 3 series' I worked on, but the leather was cracking, panels separating, etc etc. This wouldn't be of relevance for *ME* because I don't plan on keeping a vehicle more than 3 years and BMW has their maintenance program, but still, I was surprised.



In the end, I am with Picus. I prefer a *driver's* car. For years, the 3 has always defined that term and I hope after driving it (335i coupe), it will continue.
 
I hear you, and as i had said, I was expecting more of the car, a 50k replacement for this current gen m3, to combat the up coming price of the new m3.



There are some great results coming from the tuning comunity for the 335I One group has put up a chipp for a outstanding 75hp increase. I'd have to see how that drove, this car IMHO needs it across the board, not just on the top end of the rev band.



Having had the chance to drive it again, i think now part of my issue is no LSD and the squidgy runflats. I was getting some massive one wheel spin. The suspension i think is fine, for the most part, I would swap out those horrible tires and then if i must put some hefty sways on it. That should help keep it taught.
 
Your comments comparing it to the M3 are interesting, especially considering C&D's recent review (http://www.caranddriver.com/shortroadtests/11731/2007-bmw-335i-sedan.html).



335i sedan

0-60: 4.8

5-60: 5.6

Quarter: 13.5 @ 106



Last M3 they tested

0-60: 4.8

5-60: 5.3

Quarter: 13.6@105



The street start is a little off, but otherwise, it holds its own very well. I haven't driven it myself, but I'd be surprised if there's a gearing problem. Most reviews I've read have almost mentioned almost no turbo lag at all... :nixweiss
 
Ya, straight line there is no question that the 335i and the M3 are similar; but otherwise they are completely disimilar. The M3 is a drivers car through and through; it's firm, they don't use RFT's, it has LSD, etc. The 335i is still a 3-series afterall - it's firm (imo), but also very forgiving in daily driving (which is the point). I do absolutely agree with Grouse (as I mentioned in my first couple posts), that the RFTs need to go and LSD needs to be added. The RFT's are a huge mistake imo, I have instructed my pickup lady (Helga!) to have them removed before I arrive to pick the car up, heh.



One thing to note though, re: the suspension discussion we were having before; since then a number of nuremburg, hockenheim, and other "ring" lap tests have been done against M3s, S4s, SLK500's etc.. and the 335i held it's own handily (and in many cases beat the above cars) on 17" rft's. I think in an autox it might fall behind due to wheelspin (no LSD), but on ring tracks the suspension is obviously good enough to let it keep up with "more substantial" cars.



Oh, and re: tuning. Man, even I have to admit I am psyched about the tuning. Shiv @ Vishnu got more top end just from fuel tuning, and now that he's narrowed down the boost timings he says that he's been able to get 50hp/tq across the band, including better throttle response with on a light boost increase (11psi). Exciting times!



I'll be driving mine on Nuremburgring/Hockenheim on the 20th of Oct, I will let you guys know how it goes. :)
 
i drove the 335 6spd a few days ago (friend works as a bmw salesperson)...so i basically could do whatever i wanted to it. the thing was fricking SWEET. very tight, great exhaust tone, amazing pull in every gear. i'm not as picky as some, but it was one of the best cars i have driven yet in my life. i don't understand the comparison (or i should say requests to equal) of it to the M3. not only would that be foolish marketing (release a car that directly competes with another in your line-up), but it's a different beast.



amazing car!!!!
 
Update on tuning.



Stock and with some fuel tuning.



Stockvs1stattempt.jpg






Full boost control on bottom, then with 11psi and a new exhaust.



1stvs2ndattempt.jpg




54hp and 60tq peak, with a 2psi increase, some fuel tuning and an exhaust.
 
Put an lsd in it, drop it an inch, ditch the rft's, give it quattro, paint it silver, and put lil rings on it.







Darn you audi.. Where is my 360hp car!
 
Grouse said:
Put an lsd in it, drop it an inch, ditch the rft's, give it quattro, paint it silver, and put lil rings on it.







Darn you audi.. Where is my 360hp car!



What's don't you like about the S4?
 
Back
Top