Solvent vs. Cleaner - Let's clear it out

AlexRuiz

New member
I have seen several post where the 2 terms are used as intercangeable, and my mind they aren't. So I want to clear this out. I have also seen posts that state "my product doesn't contain solvents", which I think is false. Finally, I have also seen posts that "I won't apply such product as topper, it has chemical smell and will remove my application of xxx product" I think that is also false. So stop by and give your assessment.



Solvent: Agent used as "carrier" to give the product in its pre-final state (container) the physical properties to be manageable (emulsion or paste) thus allowing it to be applied. This is a "carrier agent"



Cleaner: Agent added to the product with the solely purpose of helping it remove or clean any substance present on the surface during application



This should make the difference very clear. Solvents are additional ingredients to make the product usable (carrier agents) while cleaners has the specific purpose of removing whatever that is on the surface to be applied. Thus, this leads me to the following conclusions:



ALL products with NO exceptions contains solvents, no matter if the carrier agent (solvent) is kerosene, coconut oil or donkey's milk to keep it beautiful as Cleopatra. A solvent is strictly an agent used to make the product workable before its final state!!!

Some products, in addition to the solvents contain cleaners TRUE, all in one and cleaner waxes fall in this group.

Some other products, while having solvents don't contain cleaners TRUE, pure waxes and sealants fall in this group.



It can be argued that if the carrier agent (solvent) has the property to dissolve the product in the container, it should do it also while on the surface, right? I would say partially right. Some products have been designed so the final state of the product on the surface (cured) is not easily affected by the carrier agent. Think about concrete, that while water makes the cement and sand mix workable and can affcet it or even remove it, once the concrete is dry water will not affect it. An additional agent exists in the product so the final state is not susceptible to the solvent used to kep it workable in the container. An external catalyst or curing agent is needed also (air or dryness) to change the product into its final state. I think that products know to layer well obey this rule (EX-P, Z, UPP, etc)



On the same lines, it doesn't mean that once the product is fully cured the solvent (carrier agent) won't remove it (same product) This is why older carnaubas (purer) were never truly layerable. Newer carnaubas and blends without cleaners, as well as pure sealants contain additives to ensure the final cured state is less susceptible to the original solvent (think about concrete again). I would say t is safe to assume that the purer the carnauba (less additional ingredients) the less layerable it will be. If the product contains cleaners, well, the outcome is obvious. In products without cleaners, it depends on the additional additives to ensure that some layerability is possible. #845 falls in this group, and while not a true layerable item 2 coats last longer than one, and 3 last longer than 2......



Finally, the last one is that a product with a "chemical smell" will remove whatever that is present on the surface. First, being the formulas among brands and manufacturers so different the carrier agent (solvent) of one product may not be effective at all if tried in a different formula. Second, the fact that smels chemical doesn't mean the solvent (carrier agent) is strong as remover and will be able to remove a different product. Petrolatum (vaseline) smells chemical and won't remove anything. To get out of my doubts, I did the following experiment:



- I took a glass shower door that had water spots and soap film, and washed it. It wasn't completely clean on purpose, then I took 4 products: Eagle one naowax (delicious fruity smell), poorboys EX (tropical banana like), Nu-finish (yucky chemical smell, maybe the worst smelling product) and Colllinite insulator wax #845 (chemical smell). As you can see, 2 products have nice smells and 2 had chemical smells, and each group was divided in cleaner or no cleeaning. Based on the fallacy of "chemical smell" means it will remove whatever is below the nice smells would not bond, while the chemical smells would bond. Applied them, and since application you could see that the products that contained NO cleaners were struggling (#845 and EX). Nufinish has a breeze being aplied, and nanowax wasn't difficult. Removed the hazed products and in fact the products with cleaners felt slicker right off the application (#845 is super slick, but not this time) Use the shower and by the second day the water was not beading in the Ex and #845 section while running like mad in the other 2. If you have used #845 you know that this products is as tough as a 25 cents steak, so looking at it without beading was starnge and means it didn't stick because it didn't remove what was below.



So, please chime in and share the comments.







Alex
 
Interesting post Alex. Definitely beyond "my detail for today".



My only comment is that some products use the suit of "carrier" to disguise the dual function of the carrier agent. Some products accomplish their goal of improving one's finish (increasing gloss, reflectivity, wetness, etc) by using a solvent that will purposely clean, lubricate, make product user friendly, increase volatility (drying) and also as a preservative of the protective agents.



I believe it is very difficult to make some forms of solvents (petro-based) that are in products at significant amounts to discard their cleaning (dissolving) properties. If something "does" smell like kerosene, it is very likely kerosene. Kerosene is a cleaner (i.e. great tar remove).





Let's share some thoughts, except the concept that water is a cleaner. ;) :xyxthumbs
 
I new BlkZ would chime in on this one. I'm just gonna sit back and learn.............Do you guys have chemistry backgrounds???
 
I agree and disagree with the statement s about solvents. Many products do not fit into such a neat category. Many products use a "state change" to deliver product in a usable form. An "oil in water" Configuration for example, can do several things at the same time. Your example of "Donkey Milk" is an example of what I mean.... Milk is a colloidal suspension, oil in water, water being the carrier. Not the oil. FMJ is also an "oil in water" product. The product is not dissolved in water, merely carried by it. The oil is the product which changes state. (contains the polymers) I believe this is why the idea that products such as NXT can not be layered persists. (cleaning agents, which evaporate out , leaving the Polymer to remain and cure... AIO does this too) Also, Sovents and oils do not nessesarily dissolve cured Polymers, why? because of the change of physical Chemistry formed by the cure, be it crosslinking, or just chemically changing in some other way. The oils so many dread are actually the product they desire to deliver to the paint. It may be a semantic difference, but in terms of definition, "Carrier" may be more correct than "solvent". Solvent may very well be called "cleaner". Oils can be a good thing !



:bounce :bounce :bounce





I should add that there are oils which are compatible with polymeric oils and those that are not. I would think most cleaner solvents evaporate competely so the issue (compatability) does not become a factor in the use of products containing certain types of solvents. In fact, it is quite possible certain solvents are quite benign (in their behavior) for polymers....





My apologies for having to edit:



Carnauba Wax may in some way set due to the release of "carrier solvent volatiles" in which light volatiles evaporate out, but this is by no means the same thing as the curing process of a polymer sealant. there is no crosslinking molecularly between the paint and the wax. There is only "coating", a greasy layer. To the degree that there is a difference in hardness brought on by the release of volatiles, leaving a harder underlayer of wax, and the inability of the volatiles in any new layer to soften this hardened layer before the volatiles in the new coat evaporate lies the "layerability" of Carnauba wax.



-opinion-

Cleaners in Carnauba (cleaner waxes) are almost always somewhat abrasive. To clean paint, the volatiles would have to be such that the carnauba (as well as sealants) would be affected. (because of the wax chemistry ) Solvent mixtures would conflict with the nature of carnauba wax to some degree. The solvent would have to be highly volatile and moderately corrosive to paint. A chemical sealer "wax" would not probably contain as much carnauba wax as a straight non cleaner type because it, by nature, cannot. Carnauba products and sealants are dissimilar in a lot of ways. It is all in the chemists planning and skill.....
 
Rob, Medical background. :o



Cleaners are also a good, especially for a daily driver. Even though layerability is nice, it is quite over-blown for the average (driven) car and non-Autopian detailer. What's the sense in applying a new layer over a contaminated or marred established layer? Polish and shine in 1-step is a good thing and if I were Meguiar's I would have stressed this point about NXT along with the results it achieves. Then again they were not marketing / designing this product for the Autopian type detailer and really did not need to address this subject.:cool:
 
BlkTac05 said:
I new BlkZ would chime in on this one. I'm just gonna sit back and learn.............Do you guys have chemistry backgrounds???



I forgot I started this thread. :D

By the way, Engineering in electronics for BS, masters degree in business.... ;)



I agree with most of the other posts, some "solvents" were chosen in fact to have the dual action as "cleaners" and "carrying agents". True, some carrying agents will be strong no matter if they were not chosen to act as cleaners, but I don't think that just because it "smells chemical" will clean the previous layer.



The concept of change in state is very interesting, but again, the carrier was chosen specifically to act that way. In some cases, technical limitations were the cause of the carrier chosen. For the cleaner products, and as already pointed it is quite logical that the carrier will have dual action (save money).



Thanks for the replies guys!





Alex





Edit: Mods. i think this one fits better the category of "detailing" rather than "product discussion"
 
i guess you could say that chemicals that are designed for an express purpose of cleaning- clean- and also say that some solvents may clean-but the type of cleaning or reason behind the cleaning is very different- in other words a solvent may clean but not clean what a cleaner is meant to clean- IMO black Z28 said it well for a daily driver that gets some dirt in the paint a product with very mild specific cleaners WOULD probably do a superior job of a reapplication at 1 or 2 month intervals than a product with no cleaning ability
 
DETAILKING said:
Few more important things....



1. The solvent can be WATER



2. The solvent can double as the cleaner



It all depends on what you are trying to do.



Edit: Water is called the "universal " solvent :)
 
Interestingly enough, I was talking with Mike Phillips about Meg's products; the solvent in ALL of Mag's products is water.





Tom
 
thats the rub-some products are oil in water emulsions-so the oil is inside the water drop-they can seperate while applying-you don't really know by looking at it wether the drop is polymer or TS oil
 
Back
Top