accident diminished value help please

roadster

New member
This is a repost...if no one has any suggestions can someone point me in the direction to where I can get some information please?



Thanks,



Nic



Help Please....

I have a couple of questions concerning hit and run damage to my car and filing an insurance claim for "Inherrent Diminished Value". There seems to be a great number of very knowledgable folks on this forum as well as the Reatta Forum where I spend a lot of my spare time. I have received some great feedback from the Reatta forum on location of some articles, but I am still lacking information leading to a successsful form format - preparation / submission.



In December a distant neighbor backed down his driveway and hit me broadside where I was parked while broken down with a Dodge 4 X 4. Only did about 15-1600.00 worth of damage, but the injury was to an exceptionally nice example of a 90 gray coupe.... protected/garaged and well cared for with original paint. The fellow and his neighbors huddled and collectively decided that he should play innocent and leave me to file a claim with my insurance company. I found out that they all decided this while standing around my damaged car that was displaying my disabled veteran wheel chair tag >>> not nice . I did a little detective work and with the tiny little pinhead speck of burgandy paint that he neglected/missed to clean off of my car figured him out....called the law



Anyway, my problem/questions:



Is anyone familiar with inherrent diminished value calims, the format for producing a claim, and how to determine the value of a claim?



Note...When I Googled D/Value I discovered several sites that provided a loss value service, but they charged several hundred dollars.



Now there may be a question of it just being a 1990 used automobile, but the Buick Reatta has been becoming a serious collectable for years now, has a forum dedicated exclusivly to itself on the Antique Automobile Club of America site, and was featured as "One of the 10 Most Collectable Automobiles for 2005" in Januarys edition of Hemmings. Nice examples of the Reatta hold value, in fact are increasing in value rapidly. If I were to attempt to sell my coupe tomorrow (after quality repairs had been performed) the purchaser not only would ask for a carfax to determine if there had been accident damage, but could see it as there is no way to match paint either in shade or finish. You can try to fool with blending etc., but an experienced eye will know. The buyer would ask for a substantial discount due to the damage no matter how extensive (if he didn't pass it up entirely).



My main problem is the formal or legal format to gererate the claim>>>

Is there anyone with previous experience with this type of situation or can point me in the right direction for enlightment?



I think a reasonable amount (since there was not frame or structural damage) to ask for is in the area of 15 to 20% of NADA clean retail or a realistic % of CPI, and any suggestions here would also be appreciated. (CPI=Cars of Particular Interest).



Now this would not be a terribly large claim in value, but considering the circumstances under which it happened, I feel it necessary to pursue if for no other reason the principal of it.....AND because of the overall condition of the vehicle (I would genuinely rate it a 8 on a 10) it would be of interest to a hobbist/collector, and I would definitely loose money when selling.



Current NADA Book values are as follows:

clean 3900, average 5150, and high 6175. Please keep in mind that any "book" is a guide and NADA is a used car book for average automobiles....not classics, antiques, or collectables. CPI is the book that should be consulted in this case however I do not have one.



Information compiled from this incident may very well help someone else on the forums in the future.....



Any help afforded will be greatly appreciated. Sorry for the long winded post...and excuse any spelling/grammar errors please....



Nic





__________________

'90 Reatta Gray Coupe

'90 Reatta Select Sixty





Last edited by Nic Walker on 03-01-2005 at 10:08 PM



c
 
Thanks for the reply Tom....



Never originally. I am in the process of getting some "appraisals" from knowledgable sources from the Reatta Forum and one of the Buick Club of America Technical Advisors/Board of Directors. Am scheduled for an appraisal from a fellow who says he is a licensed appraiser next week but not sure what any of this will look like. The appraisers on the internet that supposedly specialize in Dimished Value won't tell you a single (NOTHING) thing until you fork over several hundred bucks (sorry but not a total idiot :rolleyes: ).......at least want to know if it will be advantageous if I pay them.



Looking for a format or suggestions on how to go about the logistics of the thing. I feel the appraisals from the Reatta people and the one professional is a step in the right direction, but need to know if I am correct in this. Can't go back and change tactics midstream......



thanks,



Nic
 
I've been thru this and there's only so much you can do after-the-fact. The appraisal needs to be completed prior to a loss. In addition, you'd be paying higher insurance premiums all along for this additional level of coverage.



They're likely to insure the car for what it's worth - - not based upon "collector's interest" status.



It's kind of a catch22. I don't know of any great solution...the increased cost of annual insurance is going to offset the perceived inherent value of the car after âہ“Xâ€Â� number of years go by.
 
I had a similar kind of issue when my wife got rearended. We had a Chrysler Town and Country minivan (Sold two years ago). She got rearended from behind which resulted in a 4 car pileup. They obviously determined the other driver was at fault. They fixed the van which was about $4300 damage and then it came down to medical compensation. We got 2x medical bills for that. At that time, South Dakota Damage Disclosure limit was $4000. Since the repair bill was over that, we now had a damage disclosure title on the van. Did I mention at that time we were in the process of selling the van also? So I called the insurance company complaining that my vehicle lost value because it now had a damage disclosure on it and people were less likely to buy it because of that. Anyway, after about 6 months of bickering, they finally gave us an extra $1000 for compensation. Not too long later, they passed a law that raised the Damage Discloure limit to $5000. We sold the vehicle after that law, and didn't have to claim damage disclosure on the van! Luckily, it worked it our favor.



I don't know if this helps but at least someone like me has gone through the process.
 
Chroma,,,



Yes, your reply helps. Not in strategy, but gives me faith that with some patience and time, which I will also add a great deal of agravating pestering, that I may possibly at least come close to breaking even. I did not mention other factors involved >>> the fellows insurance company could have easily settled quickly early , but elected not to >>> there is a hugh degree of "matter of principal" involved here as well. I appreciate all the replies as well....



Nic
 
Back
Top