There are so many (probably a million or so variables) the would effect your answer that you will find yourself moving backwards by chasing a magic number that likely changes with a .1% change in humidty or if the clearcoat is .000001 of a mil thinner.
Yes I have. My conclusion has been printed in here a couple of times. Focus on the resuts since the tempature is a BY PRODUCT of the work done. For best results focus on the work done not the by products...
Well its not a law, its a very strong hypothesis. To prove it, you spend 3 years comming up with an ideal tempature to work your polish at, then we will get together. At this time we will get together and polish paint. You focus only on achieving a tempature and I will focus on achieving results. See who does the job quicker, more efficently, and probably removes less paint. I hope after years of calculations that the humidty, paint thickness (pre and post swelling) paint system, color, paint, tempature, etc don't change at all.
Fair enough. I am blunt as well so maybe its just the way we are.
The facts are that you are chasing a by-product of the work done when the focus should be the work done itself. Warm enough that hte lubricatents in the polish spread thin and allow the abrasives to work but not so warm that the paint is damaged.
Define research. Speaking to polish makers? Yes.... Speaking with pad makers? Yes..... 1000's and 1000's of hours polishing paint? Yes...
I'm not sure what you are saying. Consider me a small subject of your overall research, I can provide you with the contacts you desire (most who will tell you that I am an expert in this field) but they are likely to echo the same thoughts I have. Then what? You will polish paint for 1000's and 1000's of hours and get now where? Perhaps a doctorate in science or chemical/mechanical engineering will help?