Your opinion about "Nu-Finish"

Anthony8858

New member
I detailed my car using the Menzerna system. Needless to say it looks awesome.



A neighbor tells me that NOTHING beats "Nu-Finish"...The once a year car polish.



What's up with this stuff? I keep hearing about it.
 
If your car is properly prepped, then NuFinish will definitely protect it, and the car will look really good (due to the proper prep).



The positives about NuFinish:



It IS one of the longer lasting sealants. Maybe not a year, but it definitely last a long time.





The negatives about NuFinish:



High solvent content: rough on hands, lungs, and paint

Old formula (probably not VOC compliant, either): high reflections, very little jetting, gloss, or depth; the "wrapped in plastic" look of sealants from the '80s.





Conclusion: There are newer formulations that cost less, look better, last longer, and are safer to use. I'd recommend almost ANYTHING on the Pep Boy's shelf over NuFinish, but particularly TW Platinum, one of the new Mother's products (I get them all mixed up), the EO Nanowax, or new Meguiar's GC or NXT.





Tom
 
Nu-Finish is good for old beaters, but I would not use it on new car paints due its harsh abrasive thats in it. It is a cleaner/sealant so it contains chemical and abrasive cleaners.
 
EdLancer said:
Nu-Finish is good for old beaters





NuFinish
chris.gif












I could not agree more. It's probably a decent product for the person that washes/waxes their car 1X per year. (Send the crap back to Consumers' Distort!!)
 
If you're looking for a good, cheap cleaner then NuFinish is ok for older oxidised surfaces that won't be regularly maintained.



Since you've spent considerable time getting a great finish from your paint, you're better off continuing on the high-quality road and using something else.



That doesn't necessarily mean expensive 'boutique' products these days. Most OTC producers have made products of late that match the more expensive products we use to resort to. Mosca suggested several good waxes which will impress you.
 
IMHO, its one of my less favorite "80's sealants". NF, Liquid Glass, and many similar products suffer from the limitations of the first run of sealants. They tend to leave a "plasticky" look, and although they last fairly well, many of them are harsh on finishes due to the abrasives or cleaners contained within. In 1985, NF might have been decent stuff. In 2005, it's not even worth considering. The shelves of any autoparts store are stocked with sealants that are light years better: Meguiars NXT, Eagle One Nanowax, and Mothers' Reflections are 3 of the best ones out right now.
 
While I would't suggest it for show car finish, I have NO problems recommending it. In fact, I used it as my MAIN stuff for a few years (aprox 2000-early 2004 when I joined autopia) It is very durable, and it surely takes a beating. Shine is mediocre, but at that time I traded looks for durability. I used it for almost 2 years in a NEW car, and I have to show how the paint loks today :cool;



The product has a stigma associated to it, unjustified if you ask me. It doesn't last a year, heck, as BillD pointed, NOTHING will last a year. Nu-finish however can go 3 to 5.5 months. Dusts a lot, stains and the smell is toxic, but that was common for its era products. Application/removal is kind of hard, and streaks very easily.



I say it its more hated than it should. Its cleaners are very strong, but won't damage NEW paint. In fact, Klasse AIO has stronger cleaners and no one complains about AIO on new paints.....



I still have a can for those quick one-step jobs that require strong cleaning. And I find it invaluable for the wheels. I use it the same way many people use Klasse AIO: To clean and prepare. Nu-finish topped with Collinite 845 makes a tough to beat combo for wheels. Its cleaning ability is always needed in some places. Cleaning glass is also very effective with the PC and a polishing pad.



The new formula (yes, I got a new can not so long ago) dusts much less, cleans less, removes easier and looks better. Not advertised, but I am sure the formula is new as I know the product quite well, and this new behavior surprised me.



Honestly, I still have not found something more durable in the autozone shelves, but overall there are too many better more rounded products you can use and get at pep boys or similar.



So, counclusion, durable but barely better than no wax look. Where it shines is as cleaner. Use any of the alternatives already posted.
 
I'm new here, though I believe I am a somewhat more-educated newbie, since I have done restoration and body work as a hobby for close to 10 years now (I'm familiar with what goes into painting and maintaining paint). I will admit, I use NuFinish regularly. I couldn't help but do a search on NuFinish, and in all honesty I don't understand why it has such a bad rap. I do not have exposure to many of the products that are praised on this forum (I'm just now getting some exposure to the Meguiars pro line), but I will tell you this: It's not for everyone, but FOR US, NuFinish is a great product. It lasts in the Texas heat for 4 to 6 months (OK, so not a full year), and in Chicago where we lived until 2 years ago, it lasted even longer.



NuFinish is great for a daily driver that occasionally sees an automated touchless carwash, like my wife's van. I'm realistic and know that she won't take as good care of her vehicle as I do mine. She won't wash it as often, and the kids will manhandle the paint as they slide in and out (they're 4 and 6), and careless people will rub up against it frequently at the mall and grocery store, so I want something a little more durable on there. As far as OTC products, I have tried them all and NOTHING withstands daily wear and tear better than NuFinish. In my experience it is more than just marketing hype for uneducated consumers, as some of you would imply. For an abused vehicle you would be shocked by how much gloss and shine the paint has. I attribute this to the fact that we use NuFinish. I know if I were to use some of the so-called "better" waxes being touted on this forum, it would not look as good. After a couple carwashes, the "better" wax would be stripped off. Then some bird droppings, sand, or road grit would get on the paint. Then my kids would rub up against it. It would be loaded with spiderweb scratches and swirl marks by week's end. So what good would the "better" wax be at that point? Now if my wife washed every few days with gentle car wash and a two-bucket method with very careful drying in the shade using an absorber or a bagful of microfibers (like I do), it might be another story. But that currently does not occur.



With regard to shine, NuFinish is definitely not going to be an extreme makeover product. Not that it doesn't impart any gloss - it does. It's just not anything special. It doesn't hide anything, so you have to prep the car very well. But if you prep properly, I believe you can even use the $2.99 tub of Turtle Wax and get good results - it just won't last long and will probably come off on the first pass through the automated carwash. With NuFinish, we can go 4 to 6 months in 100 degree heat with 2 or 3 automated carwashes a month, and the paint's surface is still slick and beads water. As for abrasives and using NuFinish as a cleaner, I don't know where that claim comes from since you basically rub a small amount on with a damp cloth, then wipe it right off. You don't apply any pressure as is typically instructed with a cleaner wax (like the blue OTC Zymol which I have also used). That's it - it's pretty simple to apply really. Yes, it smells like a chemical, unlike the Zymol which smells like food, but so what?



My other cars (garage queen and daily driver) are Benzes and I use Clay Magic clay, Zymol HD Cleanse, and Zymol Vintage (another product that gets unfairly bashed here evidently due to the $1800 price tag). Vintage is a phenomenal product, and despite what others here will say, I find hand application to be the quickest method. I can wax a car in 10 minutes. And I can literally feel every imperfection and paint flaw for obvious reasons, which helps me easily locate and deal with problem areas before they get out of hand. I can literally say I know every square inch of my cars' bodies. But to be honest with you, I'm a little tired of having to wash gently by hand with 2-bucket method every couple of days, especially if it rains. So I am considering trading gloss for durability and switching to NuFinish, leaving the Vintage for the garage queen. I'll be able to do very quick washes with one bucket, or even go for the occasional (gasp!) automated carwash. No, it won't look as glossy or dripping wet, but the car is a white-silver so it isn't highly reflective anyway. I haven't even used the PC on it yet, and there are swirl marks if you look closely, but due to the color it looks great from 10 feet away.



I just bought the PC a couple weeks ago and have been experimenting with removing swirls, and all I can say is that prep is everything. Bottom line in my opinion is whether you use cheap OTC stuff or expensive $1800 stuff, if you prep the car properly it is going to look fantastic!



Now one thing I am considering experimenting with is applying Vintage over NuFinish...
 
My dad still has the first and only bottle of the stuff we ever bought in his shed. He bought and I applied it in once the 80's. Every once in a while I see it and smile. It's like an antique. Ahh man ya'll got me all sentimental. Maybe his car is do for another coat
 
If you're happy with Nu Finish, then keep using it. It obviously satisfies your needs for your daily driver, and if you've been unhappy with its competition, stick with it.



As this is an enthusiast forum, most negative feelings are due to its appearance, which -rightly or wrongly - are paramount to Autopians. Nu Finish looks ok, but just ok. Its certainly durable and it cleans well too. Many have found other products that are just as durable but have a better appearance, and don't mind paying a few dollars more for the complete package. But then again, one could argue that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and that Nu Finish looks beautiful. Its just that most who've tried it here don't think so. Its a personal perception. I guess that's why you pay for Zymol.



Another factor is that Autopians hate exaggerated claims. This can bias them against a product, as it loses credibilty.



gmercoleza said:
As for abrasives and using NuFinish as a cleaner, I don't know where that claim comes from since you basically rub a small amount on with a damp cloth, then wipe it right off. You don't apply any pressure as is typically instructed with a cleaner wax (like the blue OTC Zymol which I have also used).

Yes, Nu Finish is a cleaner wax too. It contains chemical cleaners (solvents) and some mild abrasives. Neither is a bad thing, IMO, as its sometimes needed to prep a bad surface for proper cohesion of the protection. That's probably part of what aids Nu Finish's durability. Neither will damage new (or old) paint. We use far more aggressive polishes on both surfaces will little detrimental effect.



Have you tried AIO and SG, or Zaino, if you favour durability?
 
Alfisti said:
If you're happy with Nu Finish, then keep using it. It obviously satisfies your needs for your daily driver, and if you've been unhappy with its competition, stick with it.



As this is an enthusiast forum, most negative feelings are due to its appearance, which -rightly or wrongly - are paramount to Autopians. Nu Finish looks ok, but just ok. Its certainly durable and it cleans well too. Many have found other products that are just as durable but have a better appearance, and don't mind paying a few dollars more for the complete package. But then again, one could argue that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and that Nu Finish looks beautiful. Its just that most who've tried it here don't think so. Its a personal perception. I guess that's why you pay for Zymol.



Another factor is that Autopians hate exaggerated claims. This can bias them against a product, as it loses credibilty.





Yes, Nu Finish is a cleaner wax too. It contains chemical cleaners (solvents) and some mild abrasives. Neither is a bad thing, IMO, as its sometimes needed to prep a bad surface for proper cohesion of the protection. That's probably part of what aids Nu Finish's durability. Neither will damage new (or old) paint. We use far more aggressive polishes on both surfaces will little detrimental effect.



Have you tried AIO and SG, or Zaino, if you favour durability?



Excellent objective post! I appreciate your input. No, I haven't tried those products and I'm always ready and willing to try something new, especially if it's readily available and comes highly recommended. I've been wanting to try NST and to be honest I wouldn't know where to get AIO, SG, or Zaino. Any recommendations?
 
Back
Top