Very little is actually used, it's more of a marketing thing. The companies went to e-coat in the early 80's, thinking it would stop all the rusting, and most stopped applying the cavatity wax as a result. (application of the anti rust wax product is a seperate step and many companies believed the ecoat would get their vehicles through the warranty period)
Didn't work so well, as where ever there is a hem flange, a "seam", the ecoat and primers will flex and break, creating a hair line crack. Once that happens, the corrosives creep in and under the ecoat and start corroding (rusting). Which is why so often the first "rusting" that shows is at the bottom of doors, the lower seam on a trunk lid, the flange/seam on a pickup tail gate.
The ASTM cavatity wax stays flexable for years, and "seeks out" bare metal, and pushes any moisture away from the exposed metal, coating it with it's self.
Undercoating does not do that, and many are just some liquified asphalt that get's hard over time,(rubberized is even worse for promoting corrosion) is not applied into the vehicle's cavatities, and will "crack", and do what is called, "pocketing'.
This is when it cracks due to age, it opens up and corrosives, moisture enter and eat under the undercoating, making a breeding ground for corrosion.
The one ValuGard provides does not "pocket" and contains a percentage of the cavatity anti corrosion wax in it.
Another issue with "assembly" of a body, is that wherever the robots make a weld, the chemistry of the metal is changed, making it more corrosion prone. The ecoat helps reduce that problem, until the "weld" area starts to flex with age, then the ecoat cracks and rust starts.
Just a little "primer" on corrosion and such so everyone can make intelligent decisions in caring for the vehicle.