RH said:
Can you point to lab results which "prove" the statement?
I cant see why BMW, Volvo, Mercedes, etc would all use high dust pads when a 95% reduction in dust can be achieved with the same results in stopping power?!?!
Enlighten me, please.
RH - Can't claim to have the power to "enlighten" anyone. Nor am I motivated enough to do the research or commission a lab to "prove" results.
Since free forum information from a complete stranger on the internet is worth exactly what one paid for it,

I can share the following:
I have been advised by those unbiased experts, whose opinions I trust, that the differences in stopping power (if any) are not material. The issue is in potential damage to the rotors. I have not noticed any such rotor wear damage, and if I did, I am not price-sensitive to replacing rotors.
But to these experts, reduction in dust is apparently at the expense of rotor wear. I would surmise (see my comment to Alan below) that BMW feels that, due to their 100% maintenance coverage, the would not bear the exposure of greater expense of rotor replacement, when pad replacement is cheaper for them.
Alan B said:
I assume they won't void the BMW warranty, correct?
Alan - My BMW guys stated that during the 100% maintenance period, you must stick w/ OEM pads and sensors. Otherwise, during the ensuing general warranty period, Mintex/Rotex are OK.
BTW - Squeal can be an issue w/ these pads. Make sure you use plenty of anti-squeal compound.
I use them on my E38's - They will be available for my E65 within a few months.