| Welcome to the Autopia.org. You are viewing as a guest. By joining our FREE community you will be able to interact with others. Plus, when you join you will receive instant coupon codes for special discounts with our sponsors. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
|
11-12-07, 10:01
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Empty My Wallet
crew219 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: ITH, NY Posts: 206 | Menzerna PO106FF vs PO106FA opinions . . . I managed to purchase a bottle of 106FA and try it out side by side on some hard Audi paint. Visually, both the 106FF and FA appear identical except the FF seemed a bit more viscous. Using both polishes on the metabo with a white LC CCS pad, the FA provided a longer working time than FF and the dusting was reduced. The working time was very close to PO85RD and ultimately resulted in a finish that didn't seemed to be improved upon by a subsequent polishing by 85RD. Initial cut with FA might have been slightly less than FF, but the finish ended up being slightly better, probably due to the longer working time.
In conclusion, FF and FA are quite similar, except FA seems to contain more lubricants which allow the polish to be worked longer for a more complete breakdown of the polish.
Dave | |
| |
12-13-07, 03:13
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Registered User
landcruiser is offline
Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 267 | Re: Menzerna PO106FF vs PO106FA opinions . . . Quote: |
Originally Posted by crew219 I managed to purchase a bottle of 106FA and try it out side by side on some hard Audi paint. Visually, both the 106FF and FA appear identical except the FF seemed a bit more viscous. Using both polishes on the metabo with a white LC CCS pad, the FA provided a longer working time than FF and the dusting was reduced. The working time was very close to PO85RD and ultimately resulted in a finish that didn't seemed to be improved upon by a subsequent polishing by 85RD. Initial cut with FA might have been slightly less than FF, but the finish ended up being slightly better, probably due to the longer working time.
In conclusion, FF and FA are quite similar, except FA seems to contain more lubricants which allow the polish to be worked longer for a more complete breakdown of the polish.
Dave | Pretty much my thoughts as well. The FA just seems to have just a bit more "friendliness" to it. Also, Phil IMHO goes out of his way to stay on top of the latest product updates and to make sure he has them available for his customers. | |
| |
12-13-07, 03:59
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Deep Gloss Auto Salon
MotorCity is online now Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Michigan Posts: 1,113 | Re: Menzerna PO106FF vs PO106FA opinions . . . this would directly concur with what Jef Silvers from Menzerna USA has posted here on Autopia several times | |
| |
12-13-07, 04:01
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Registered User
landcruiser is offline
Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 267 | Re: Menzerna PO106FF vs PO106FA opinions . . . Ah, that Jef is one smart guy! | |
| |
12-13-07, 04:14
|
#5 (permalink)
| | BANNED FOR SPAMMING
SVR is offline
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: South Australia Posts: 2,465 | Re: Menzerna PO106FF vs PO106FA opinions . . . | |
| |
12-14-07, 08:28
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Registered User
wannafbody is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 5,710 | Re: Menzerna PO106FF vs PO106FA opinions . . . Sounds like FA may be the Blackfire version.
__________________
2000 WS6 TA NBM
| |
| |
12-14-07, 09:42
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Registered User
porta is offline
Join Date: May 2005 Location: Sweden Posts: 1,023 | Re: Menzerna PO106FF vs PO106FA opinions . . . FA and Blackfire is not the same version. FA is an upgraded version of FF. It was first used by Chrysler Benz. The main goal was to get less dust during polishing.
Maybe Jeff Silver told something else but this was what Menzerna Germany told me. | |
| |
12-14-07, 10:48
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Deep Gloss Auto Salon
MotorCity is online now Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Michigan Posts: 1,113 | Re: Menzerna PO106FF vs PO106FA opinions . . . Quote: |
Originally Posted by porta FA and Blackfire is not the same version. FA is an upgraded version of FF. It was first used by Chrysler Benz. The main goal was to get less dust during polishing.
Maybe Jeff Silver told something else but this was what Menzerna Germany told me. | Jeff did not get into the specifics of why FA came about but did say that the difference was a very slight tweak to the recipe to fit the request of a customer OEM.. he did say that the differences in final output would be very hard / near impossible to decern | |
| |
12-14-07, 11:22
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Banned
WilliamHBonney is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: USA!!! Posts: 1,416 | Re: Menzerna PO106FF vs PO106FA opinions . . . Wow!!! Kick a$$ pictures!! | |
| |
12-14-07, 11:31
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Registered User
jpochile is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Santiago , Chile Posts: 279 | Re: Menzerna PO106FF vs PO106FA opinions . . . Those are impressive pictures . Talking perfect mirror reflection .
Very impressive indeed .
Cheers ,Jean Paul | |
| |
12-14-07, 01:24
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Registered User
simrich is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Melbourne,Australia Posts: 4 | Re: Menzerna PO106FF vs PO106FA opinions . . . SVR,Mate,
Your third photo of the products reflection shot is priceless!
Will drop you an email soon!
Regards,
Simon | |
| |
12-14-07, 02:09
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Cork is offline
Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 44 | Re: Menzerna PO106FF vs PO106FA opinions . . . That looks like a nice truck. | |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On | | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:49. | | | |